Objectives of the program against the grant of the State

One of the "effects of the situation in Indonesia in the (internal)" contained in the opening paragraph-IV, 1945 Constitution, which says:. Paragraph "promote the general welfare .. While connected with the provisions of Article 33 (2) and (3) of the Constitution of 1945 confirms the dominance of natural resources (SDA) in Indonesia by the state monopoly is clearly a form of State / Government of the natural resources that exist in Indonesia.

Therefore, on this basis the "subsidy" for the basic needs of the population is clearly a logical consequence of the monopoly of natural resources is the state. If subsidies to basic needs of people, without exception, abolished / waiver, then it is a betrayal of our country's goal of "promoting the general welfare."

All questions, whether people should be granted and rely on government subsidies?

This question, of course, people should not depend on government subsidies, but regardless of the ideals that "subsidy" from the government for any reason should not be written off / waiver, because as mentioned above is a consequence the state monopoly in the SDA.

Can you imagine if people had the right from the beginning of the independence of Indonesia to the authority or control over the management of natural resources since the days of the old order (Orla), the New Order period (New Order) to now, people had enough time to take advantage of the opportunity to develop natural resources in the business community and destiny did not collapse, as now, people suffering from absolute poverty tend to be poor.

Countries for other purposes listed in the opening 1945 of Aline IV is "the intellectual life of the nation" is a form of government responsibilities in the improvement of human resources (HR), so that people can improve their welfare, which in time will not necessarily depend on the contributions made by the government, even if the subsidy should still be given, but people certainly do not oppose the grant is set more demanding.

In the era of globalization, which emphasizes the life of a market economy in which growth is on the left and the economic welfare of the people completely free market mechanism, the situation is clearly the country / people of Indonesia were not willing to follow, because in addition to the SDA in Indonesia and was largely controlled by kavitalis (investors) and most of the industries that dominate the lives of people is controlled by foreigners, making it harder for the government to restore the position of current direction, as defined in Article 33, paragraph (2) which states that "the industries is important for control of the country and the welfare of the majority state-controlled ".

And for the scholarship program for the basic needs of the population, including fuel supplied to the affected people are always, as government revenues, in addition to relying on market economics associated with the types of taxes and taxes imposed directly by the people and companies also benefit from the life, whose number can not be said to be more important because the state sector are few, and is due to the large companies in Indonesia are in their mostly owned by foreign companies or foreign investors.

In conclusion, the subsidy will always be disturbed people and government policies that are always trying to reduce and eliminate subsidies clearly contrary to the purposes of the State mentioned in paragraph IV of the Constitution of 1945.