Mafia Law and Justice

Mafia Law refers to the formation process of the law by the legislature are a lot of notes of a few narrow interests of certain political orientation groups. It was then that the law in Indonesia's policy towards the achievement of all the political nuances of the law can only be admitted as a doctrine and a political decision on public policy, political nuances here, but not the narrow interests of a "political laws" the second, but it aims to balance the interests of the whole community of life and long term.

As one small example of the birth of the Labour Law No. 25 of 1997 which began on October 1, 2002 (based on No. 3 of 2000, which was designated as the 28th Perpu Act 2000), but still no place under six months UU the legislation was repealed March 25, 2003, with most states diundangkan # 13 in 2003 to replace the Labour Act No. 25 of 1997.

A mixture of the Law on employment in Indonesia can not escape the attraction between the interests of the employees' interests with the interests of traders must have business interests is supported by the designated "Politicians are rotten."

Finally was able to establish the existence of Law 13 of 2003 councils, employment is more favorable in practice between operators. Statement of the fate of others suffering agree, and everything happens for a political factor to legislators to limit.

Mafia is the justice here means that the law in practice, is in the hands of law enforcement implicitly that "law and justice" has become a product that can be exchanged.

Law and justice of the state expensive products. The principles of justice, that the magnitude of the costs, companies in a fast, light and medium term is hard to find in judicial practice. Application of state compared to determine how connected immersed in other words the "sensitive and difficult to wait."

A rule of law in Indonesia is done quickly "culture of corruption in the bureaucracy and the social stratification which is made of the rule are limited by sloganitas with rhetoric and empty words.

In fact, the law again, it is undeniable that not a direct result of the goods may be charged. It's a bit 'is, ironically, part of our community who are interested as a buyer. Here Tanpak more justice and legal certainty could be given for free only to a person or the same as he had offered to another party.

This statement is to clarify the law in this state "never" for the weak and poor. "Again, never ..." Sarcasm is the nature sarkatisme said, "Give me a good judge, a prosecutor rather a good policy with the arms straight, but I got the results that are better than the best bed ever this country."

But perhaps the police, politicians, the Agency and the personalities of our society does not have the time and space to be happy mengubris all forms of satire, in which the existence of duties and responsibilities publiknya, by reducing rejekinya satire. It was the process of legislation and implementation process that led to the stigmatization of the law and the legal mafia in Indonesia, where we try to speak in the cultural mentality seems to mengakar as a nation.

To call the mafia and the law tends eksistensinya everlasting righteousness, because the virus has become entrenched attitudes in the process of law in this state. Until about law enforcement in Indonesia can not simply dismiss the judge dismissed the fate of justice and corrupt politics, but this improvement must begin with the development of approaches to cultural development and education in our state of mind of people, and moral and ethical development based of strong national faith and devotion to God Almighty.

However, attempts to place the commander of the state law is needed is the will of the movement of the polical political attention and moral elite of the whole child, the fate of the inhabitants of this land, and other corrupt politicians membrantas pressure to take over !

Reade more >>

Objectives of the program against the grant of the State

One of the "effects of the situation in Indonesia in the (internal)" contained in the opening paragraph-IV, 1945 Constitution, which says:. Paragraph "promote the general welfare .. While connected with the provisions of Article 33 (2) and (3) of the Constitution of 1945 confirms the dominance of natural resources (SDA) in Indonesia by the state monopoly is clearly a form of State / Government of the natural resources that exist in Indonesia.

Therefore, on this basis the "subsidy" for the basic needs of the population is clearly a logical consequence of the monopoly of natural resources is the state. If subsidies to basic needs of people, without exception, abolished / waiver, then it is a betrayal of our country's goal of "promoting the general welfare."

All questions, whether people should be granted and rely on government subsidies?

This question, of course, people should not depend on government subsidies, but regardless of the ideals that "subsidy" from the government for any reason should not be written off / waiver, because as mentioned above is a consequence the state monopoly in the SDA.

Can you imagine if people had the right from the beginning of the independence of Indonesia to the authority or control over the management of natural resources since the days of the old order (Orla), the New Order period (New Order) to now, people had enough time to take advantage of the opportunity to develop natural resources in the business community and destiny did not collapse, as now, people suffering from absolute poverty tend to be poor.

Countries for other purposes listed in the opening 1945 of Aline IV is "the intellectual life of the nation" is a form of government responsibilities in the improvement of human resources (HR), so that people can improve their welfare, which in time will not necessarily depend on the contributions made by the government, even if the subsidy should still be given, but people certainly do not oppose the grant is set more demanding.

In the era of globalization, which emphasizes the life of a market economy in which growth is on the left and the economic welfare of the people completely free market mechanism, the situation is clearly the country / people of Indonesia were not willing to follow, because in addition to the SDA in Indonesia and was largely controlled by kavitalis (investors) and most of the industries that dominate the lives of people is controlled by foreigners, making it harder for the government to restore the position of current direction, as defined in Article 33, paragraph (2) which states that "the industries is important for control of the country and the welfare of the majority state-controlled ".

And for the scholarship program for the basic needs of the population, including fuel supplied to the affected people are always, as government revenues, in addition to relying on market economics associated with the types of taxes and taxes imposed directly by the people and companies also benefit from the life, whose number can not be said to be more important because the state sector are few, and is due to the large companies in Indonesia are in their mostly owned by foreign companies or foreign investors.

In conclusion, the subsidy will always be disturbed people and government policies that are always trying to reduce and eliminate subsidies clearly contrary to the purposes of the State mentioned in paragraph IV of the Constitution of 1945.

Reade more >>